Today's "Da Vinci Home" official Weibo responded to last night's "Central Television's "Weekly Quality Report" reporter Li Wenxue through the Chinese Internet TV station's solemn statement", Da Vinci Home said that he has reported Li Literature to the judicial authorities. At the same time, the materials that complained to the media about Li Wenxue are supported by evidence. They also listed the articles about the suspected crimes of Li Wen in the Tianya Community and the Kaidi community in 2007. They are welcome to file a lawsuit and will disclose the evidence in court.
More strikingly, in the response, "Da Vinci Home" pointed out for the first time that Li Wenxu attempted to invade the Hangzhou Airport store, and wanted to rename "Da Vinci" to "Findach".
The following is the full response of Da Vinci's home:
Response to Li Wen’s personal statement
1. Li Wen’s statement is responsible for the authenticity of the contents reported in the “Weekly Quality Report†on July 10 and 17. Please Li Wen responded to the following questions:
1. On July 10th, the “Weekly Quality Report†reported that the Da Vinci furniture purchased by Tang Ying was pungent and had serious quality problems. The facts are: In September 2010, Da Vinci sued Tang Ying for arrears of civil disputes. He was tried three times in the People’s Court of Dongcheng District, Beijing. Da Vinci was willing to entrust the court’s designated appraisal agency for quality appraisal, but Tang The UK has been unsure of the accreditation body, which has led to the failure of litigation. As long as Li Wenxue is in contact with Da Vinci, he can understand the truth of the matter. Why did the report on July 10 not have any formal interview with Da Vinci? Why is the report not mentioning that Da Vinci is passing the court? Recourse to Tang Ying for arrears, but only listen to Tang Ying’s words? How is Li Wenxue responsible for this authenticity?
On February 10th, the “Weekly Quality Report†alleged that the Italian Cappuccino brand furniture sold by Da Vinci was domestically produced, and there was a problem of origin fraud. The fact is: On April 19, 2011, CCTV reporter Zhu Feng went to Kabri to interview the factory in Kantu Town, Italy. The reporter of Zhu Feng has been confirmed by the manufacturer. Da Vinci sells the furniture originally produced by Italian manufacturers. At the time, Feng reporter explained the real situation of the origin to the domestic call, and questioned the interview arrangement of Li Wenxue. Li Wenxue knew the situation at that time (this interview video has been uploaded to the network). Why did the "Weekly Quality Report" two programs not only reflect the facts of this interview, but the situation of the report is contrary to the fact that Zhu Feng reporters went to the factory for interviews? How is Li Wenxue responsible for this authenticity?
3. Another important fact of the “Weekly Quality Report†on July 10 is that CCTV reporter interviewed Peng Jie, the general manager of Dongguan Changfeng Furniture Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Changfeng Furniture Factoryâ€). The fact is: Peng Jie is not the general manager of Changfeng Furniture Factory. Peng Jie is the salesman who runs freely for each furniture factory on the streets of Dongguan. The legal representative of Changfeng Furniture Factory and the real general manager are Huang Wencong. With the ability and means of CCTV reporters to find out who is the general manager and legal representative of Changfeng Furniture Factory, it is very easy for Li Wenxue to identify a free running single Peng Jie as the general manager of Changfeng Furniture Factory. How is Li Wenxue responsible for this authenticity?
4. The core fact of the “Weekly Quality Report†on July 10 is that the Italian Cappuccino furniture sold by Da Vinci was contracted at Changfeng Furniture Factory and sold at a price of 9,795 yuan. To prove that Changfeng Furniture Factory manufactures 50 million yuan of furniture for Da Vinci's OEM every year. The fact is: The layout hangers that Changfeng Furniture Factory has processed for Da Vinci are the self-contained items used to display fabrics in the Da Vinci exhibition hall in Shenzhen. Dongguan Industrial and Commercial Bureau has found that Changfeng Furniture Factory and Da Vinci Company have no business transactions and bank capital transactions except for the two layouts (a 9,795 yuan, a sum of 12,921.40 yuan). The relevant investigation conclusions have been published on the official website of the Guangdong Provincial Administration for Industry and Commerce. In the end, how did Li Wenxue investigate and confirm the fact that Changfeng Furniture Factory has produced 50 million yuan of furniture for Da Vinci every year? How is Li Wenxue responsible for this authenticity?
5. On July 17th, the “Weekly Quality Report†reported that the Da Vinci Chongqing store had the problem of fraudulent customs declaration of imported goods. The fact is: According to the report in this period, the result of the Chongqing Industrial and Commercial Bureau's investigation into Shanghai Customs is that Da Vinci does not have the problem of forging customs declarations. Shanghai Customs commissioned an accountant to audit Da Vinci and concluded that Da Vinci had a true declaration of origin in the customs import procedures. How is Li Wenxue responsible for this authenticity?
6. The administrative authorities for industry and commerce have already verified that Da Vinci’s existence fraud is not found. Why did Li Wen’s leading column group never report this core fact, but instead intentionally “ignore†this investigation conclusion in relevant follow-up reports?
I have carefully studied the two issues of Li Wen's July 10th and 17th Weekly Quality Report. The core facts of the whole report are false, even deliberately arranged by the director. I am willing to work with Li Wenxue. The two reports were screened and analyzed, and the facts of both parties were placed in front of the public and accepted by everyone.
Second, Li Wenwen claims that there is no collusion with others and the behavior of Da Vinci's home. Why did Li Wenyi lie to me that there is still a 500-minute video of Da Vinci's unfavorable video to broadcast? Why threaten me if I don’t pay Tang Ying’s 4.5 million yuan, will my husband be jailed? Why does Li Wenxue not respond to his familiarity with Tang Ying and his wife?
Third, the relevant Li literature asked Da Vinci to ask for 1 million yuan. Li Wenxue can verify with his friend Cui Bin that Cui Bin knows the whole truth. I am convinced that Cui Bin has already understood the difference between the Chinese law and the accomplice of "fraudulent crime". Da Vinci has reported the relevant clues to the judiciary. Whether Li Wenxue accepts the one million yuan to extort Da Vinci, I believe that the Chinese judiciary will investigate clearly according to law.
4. I have noticed that as early as 2007, Tianya Community and Kaidi Community had articles on Li Literature suspected of committing crimes. Li Wenx may wish to refute and clarify this to safeguard his reputation.
5. Li Wenwen claimed that Da Vinci’s payment of the so-called public relations fee to the public relations company has nothing to do with it. However, when Li Wenxue and Cui Bin and I personally had as many as five interviews, Li Wenxue taught me that it is reasonable to pay public relations fees. I asked Li Wenxue to make some objective positive reports on CCTV on the Da Vinci incident, but Li Wenxue suggested that Da Vinci should invite his Italian luxury giants to CCTV's two sets of Dialogue and China Financial Reporting. And again mentioned the need for the corresponding fee.
Sixth, in addition to suspected of extorting Da Vinci, Li Wenxuo also attempted to take the risk of invading the Hangzhou Airport. It is even recommended that Leonardo da Vinci change its name to Fendaqi, dilute the Da Vinci brand and strengthen the Italian brand represented by Da Vinci.
SMS Nonwoven Machine,SMS Spunbond Machine,Meltblown Nonwoven Machine,SMS Advanced Spunbond Machine
ZHEJIANG YINFEN GROUP , https://www.yingfengmachinery.com