There are five kinds of diseases in the construction of a smart city. We must correct the "five views"
HC Security Reuters Currently, there are five smart city construction disease. These five diseases have made the concept of a smart city overhead, not only failing to solve all the problems faced by the city, but also increasing the burden on the city and even becoming a laughing stock. The first type of illness is "all-in-one", trying to build a complete system of wisdom, and the result is nothing. The second type of disease is "pointing bias", focusing on the organization of information systems, while ignoring that information systems are only part of a larger system. The third type of disease is “staying at the endâ€, and many of them can be solved in the traditional way, and the information system is hard to be used, resulting in huge waste. The fourth type of disease is "over-treatment", which cannot be carefully calculated and caused a lot of waste. The fifth disease is “government monopolizationâ€, ignoring that smart cities are the whole society and turning the government into the sole buyer.
One is the strategic view. Urban problems are complicated and require a strategic vision to grasp the core issues. Finding the wrong question means putting limited resources into the wrong place. Different positions determine different horizons, and the understanding of the problem is different. To raise a strategic issue, you must stand at the height of the mayor. To build and manage a city well, we must first solve the problem of development orientation. Secondly, we must solve the structural problems. Once again, we must solve the problems of various systems' performance and stability. If the positioning is wrong, the development will be weak; the structure prediction is wrong, there is a ghost city or a series of urban problems; the lack of rules in the public facilities configuration may cause some people to be overcrowded, and the other part may be a door. Therefore, the first step to achieving wisdom is to solve the wisdom of urban macro-decision and overall planning. On this basis, let's talk about construction, management and operation. All subsequent remedial measures can only be half the battle.
The second is the system view. Many problems in the city are caused by a combination of factors, and solutions that target only one of them are necessarily ineffective. We need to consider the factors of time process, the factors of the performer, the factors of the institutional mechanism, the factors of using the object, and the factors affecting the correlation between different subsystems. If we only focus on the construction of information systems in the process of building a smart city, its failure is almost inevitable. Misuse of land use, traffic problems will occur; poor management of rivers and lakes wetlands, ecological environment and drainage will be problematic; information system construction is perfect, can not be maintained later, the entire system will be scrapped; monitoring system is operating normally, the operator behind Or the decision-making system is derelict, and the emergencies cannot be handled; the data platform is built without a suitable analysis model, and the data value cannot be realized. Therefore, the trap that falls into the "smart application" becomes "wisdom is useless"!
The third is the practical concept. It is true wisdom to solve problems with the most labor-efficient and efficient method. In reality, we often see a lot of illusion, and occasionally it can, but beware of the trap of technology. Some companies and even experts like to show decision makers some foxes and whispers, which are dazzling but not practical. For example, smart homes, many manufacturers are trying to install remote controls with our homes, remote lighting, remote control curtains and the like become standard. However, what is the best way to switch curtains? Stand up and take two steps! For example, in many places, a smart public bicycle system has been built, which is equivalent to 10,000 yuan per bicycle. It is enough to lose 100 times without operating and maintenance costs. Is this wisdom? For the city, the truth is the same. Many times, standing up and taking two steps, the effect far exceeds the construction of information systems.
The fourth is a moderate view. Many cities have clearly stated that smart cities should treat urban diseases. It can be said that they are already in place, but there are still deviations in specific practices. For example, the scorpion hurts to go to the hospital. This is acceptable to everyone. As a result, the doctor diagnosed that this is a digestive system problem. All the throat and gastrointestinal tract need to be examined and treated. This is unacceptable. Although this situation does exist, at least we are sensible in the treatment of the disease. So why is it easy to forget the roots when building a smart city? Obviously, no city needs to cover all kinds of intelligence indicators, and there is no need to try to solve all the problems of a system.
The fifth is the open concept. A smart city is not a matter of the government. In fact, everyone does not say a smart government. Because the completion of a smart city requires the joint efforts of the whole society, what the government can do is to take advantage of the trend and make a difference. Inspire the vitality of the market and social subjects, they will be able to grasp the trend of demand development most accurately, and promote the city to wisdom with the most efficient and most economical. In the past, we saw that Didi taxis and Didi buses have promoted the solution of urban traffic problems. Nowadays, the innovation of Mobike bicycles has played an important role in promoting our green travel, and it is in stark contrast to the public bicycle projects in some of our cities. Don't think that what companies do is not related to smart cities. The smart services, Internet of Things, cloud computing, and social innovation provided by enterprises are also the result of the construction of smart cities. They must not only be written into the top-level design outline of smart cities, but also more. The market treats these market innovations with an inclusive attitude. Recognizing the role of the market and social actors, we may realize that the centralization of building based on mass customization platforms is not necessarily the best architecture for smart cities. In the future, cloud-based, self-organizing-based technologies are likely to emerge.
We analyzed the smart city development strategies of more than 30 major metropolitan cities around the world. No country like China has been given such high hopes and has so many actions. This is an opportunity for us to seize the opportunities of the world. But we also see that these foreign cities are moving towards wisdom through a series of negligible small actions. After a few years, what is more intelligent? Hard to say. Every smart city in China needs to re-examine existing plans and actions from the perspectives of strategy, system, use, moderation and openness. This "five views" is correct, and we will not go astray.
Editor in charge: Zhong Juanjuan
Silicone Bottle,Silicone Water Bottle,Silicone Outdoor Sport Water Bottle,Silicone Sports Drink Water Bottle
Ningbo Auland International Co.,Ltd. , https://www.everdrinkingbottle.com